All
Here in MO, 55% or 1,456 games out of 2,602 were doubles. Selecting the digit to double has odds of
1 in 4 or 25%. When we choose to play a double we are left with choosing 1 from 3 or 33.3% of picking
the correct digit from the pool of the remaining 3, .25*.33=.0825 and .0825*1465= 120 and 2602/120
is 21.68. If we then factor in that a double has 3 ways the digits can be arranged we multiply 21.68*3 and
end up with 1 in 65.04. There are 64 H-codes so we can conclude that the actual draws are very near the
expected, around 1% difference.
I say all this because no matter how we slice it the overall is going to conform to the expected over time.
The hybrid codes are useless unless they provide us some sort of analytical predictability. I believe they do
but it's to what extent that needs to be determined. I have found methods that will earn a profit but my
time is also valuable. The amount of time I spend each day to do a setup then fill out the betslips then the
travel time to pick up the tickets I feel has to be factored in. I think the minimum wage is around $10.00
per hour now, may be even higher. If I could earn five to ten $K profit over the next 100 draws then I would
be stupid not to play but so far nothing has worked that well.
I am still playing on paper and will until I have a winning plan. It may be that the Hybrid ends up in the junk box
along with maybe 100 other ideas that looked good at first. Some people PM me about some system they have
that wins all the time until it's tested. I know a guy that spends thousands at the casinos and when he wins $500
he thinks he tore the casino a new hole, I am in the wrong business.
Anyway, I am not ready to give up on this venture and hope others will keep looking. We might find something and
we might not.
P.S. I will be uploading at least one more version of the H-code tool, I changed the way the data is displayed in the
Q-stat options and added a couple new visual aids. Look for it in a couple days.
RL