Thanks for the numbers, MikeK. That number came in my workout for today also, but I only play evening numbers. There are so many good numbers in your workout that I see for tonight, that I am very confused. From two of my workouts, I got the following, which include some numbers from yours.
First:
248, 245, 249, 285, 289, 259, 485,489, 459, 859 (added: 247)
Second:
231-239-235-219-215-195-319-315-395-195
A little explanation here, so the newbies can get ideas on how to help them pick numbers. It might not work all the time, but from one idea a person can develop others as well and build on until you finally strike a hit.
From the two workouts, I haven't decided what to pick yet as there are so many, but outside of these, I will play 065 and 409 (I had those in my predictions yesterday--can't remember the order!) plus 509, 210 and 220. Reason for the last 3 is because on the 509, 14 sum is due and those are the most out numbers per my visual calculations, 210 has a split pair of 2 which, again, according to my "eye-balling" calculations is the most out, and the same goes for the 220 double. 2 still shows like a good number. The 210 is the same, split sum pair 2, plus 1 is also a cold, due number, per Casho--actually he says it's the most out number.
I did the first workout by wheeling 5 numbers, hot, warm and cold. The second follows the most out numbers by position rundown. Actually, I purchased Versabet about 10 months or so ago after a straight win--thank you Lee if you read this for letting me know-- and it can do everything automatically, but most of the time since I am away from my computer quite a bit I got used to just giving a quick glance at numbers to come up with it. It might not be as accurate that way, but is better than nothing. Practice makes perfect. I filter the numbers by using the good ol' odd/even-high/low technique. Except sometimes they can fool you. My recent straight hit of 601 was obtained using those filters but the position was done using your prediction, MikeK. The not-so-easy part is getting the most due pair sum. I have been monitoring the technique for quite a long time that way, glancing and guesstimating it. With good record-keeping this could be made easier, but I really don't have the time. Casho shows a very clever idea on how to do this in an easy way. Versabet doesn't do this, at least visible to the naked eye, unless it's built in the background into their calculations. I mentioned it to them before, but, I think it's not there yet.
MikeK maybe you can create something about this for us. Thanks.
Good Luck.