1> I am the sole creator of the system, I developed this software because I wanted a tool that had features no other software had.
2> My system has not been in use very long by users who have been working with it. It is a very complex system, and requires alot of time to setup and design the filter structures for a single lottery. You asked what has it won? To date, I have not been informed of a single successful prediction. Why is that? The software was just released as a BETA version. Until then, it was an Alpha version, but was released to the public anyway. Most users up to this point have not given me any feedback whatsoever. No bug reports, no thanks, NADA. Did they ever get it installed? I don't know.
The software is capable of demonstating how well it WOULD HAVE performed with any design over the lifetime of the historical data. IN fact, using the history is exactly how the software performs it's optimizations.
3> To date, I only know of 3-4 users who actually USE the software. According to the project website, it is being downloaded about 20-50 times a day. Given those statistics, I should have well over a few thousand users now, still with NO FEEDBACK!
4> I have no idea.
WINHunter is still in it's infancy. But the project has SOOOO much room to grow. There are functions, and concepts of functions that other software do not, nor do I believe they will ever have. At this point of the project, I believe it would take a large team of developers a coupel of years to catch up to the level of architecture that is already in place in WINHunter.
Don't let the lack of user feedback or the lack of win reports fool you. WINHunter is Freeware. It will catch on. Features will continue to be added, and other software vendors will fail to keep up. As the user base builds, so will the project support. It is only a matter of time.
And as for what I meant by consisently, I mean it will consistently reduce the numbers required to play. How many numbers? I don't know. With a few simple settings, you can eliminate 6-10 numbers from a 6/49 or 6/53 lottery and still capture 50+% of the jackpots in the output predictions. AS you apply more filters, you reduce the amount of numbers predicted, and you also reduce the amount of jackpots you capture.
In september of last year, I was able to configure the software and have it capture a drawing two weeks prior from only 11 numbers predicted! I firmly believe, that with a well designed filter, and the correct Wheel, WINHunter will be able to closely match a signature of a lottery. Can it do it now? I don't think so, simply because there are still not enough tools in WINHunter's tool box. But give it time. The project has made it this far!
"Are you saying it is only a matter of time before WINHunter predicts ALL 6 numbers in any given Lotto on a consistent basis? I would love to see that. But, I DO NOT believe you can predict all 6 numbers to be drawn on a regular basis."
No, I am not saying on a draw per draw basis. I don't think ANY software can do that.
Andrew