United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Apr 24, 2018
With evolving patterns, you best option in my opinion is to create your own data irrespective of the past .
This chart is simple string sets to study digit transitions for strategic waging.
A. The digits of each string is PRIORITIZED
B. Transit digits are deleted ONE AT TIME
C. Final string should not be more than 6
P4 Chart
83472
41790
01347
90612
51893
30169
14092
Workout: Say, your input is the set 4288, then transit digits 4,2,8,8 are considered individually from the string chart to form> a string. You do not have to use all the sets.
4>8372, 2>9061, 8>5193, 8>3472
4288 string= 8372906151933472=3790615193372=3337799110652=37910652(to be reduced to 6 length)
keep your observation to the first triad of your final string, reduce triple digits to two when compressing digits to desire length(personal adjustment I should say).
United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Apr 24, 2018
With evolving patterns, you best option in my opinion is to create your own data irrespective of the past .
This chart is simple string sets to study digit transitions for strategic waging.
A. The digits of each string is PRIORITIZED
B. Transit digits are deleted ONE AT TIME
C. Final string should not be more than 6
P4 Chart
83472
41790
01347
90612
51893
30169
14092
Workout: Say, your input is the set 4288, then transit digits 4,2,8,8 are considered individually from the string chart to form> a string. You do not have to use all the sets.
4>8372, 2>9061, 8>5193, 8>3472
4288 string= 8372906151933472=3790615193372=3337799110652=37910652(to be reduced to 6 length)
keep your observation to the first triad of your final string, reduce triple digits to two when compressing digits to desire length(personal adjustment I should say).
United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Apr 24, 2018
With evolving patterns, you best option in my opinion is to create your own data irrespective of the past .
This chart is simple string sets to study digit transitions for strategic waging.
A. The digits of each string is PRIORITIZED
B. Transit digits are deleted ONE AT TIME
C. Final string should not be more than 6
P4 Chart
83472
41790
01347
90612
51893
30169
14092
Workout: Say, your input is the set 4288, then transit digits 4,2,8,8 are considered individually from the string chart to form> a string. You do not have to use all the sets.
4>8372, 2>9061, 8>5193, 8>3472
4288 string= 8372906151933472=3790615193372=3337799110652=37910652(to be reduced to 6 length)
keep your observation to the first triad of your final string, reduce triple digits to two when compressing digits to desire length(personal adjustment I should say).
United States
Member #142,488
May 13, 2013
8,793 Posts
Offline
I like to consider myself as pretty bright .... but i cannot understand this in the slightest ... this system is a gold mine from looking thru the thread and the results it's producing with such a short list, especially for pick4 .... i hope adobea is getting rich off this ... i would be willing to pay for those lists she comes up with ...
winning numbers are found using odds , patterns, history, and a little work - anything else is just a coincidence, unless your psychic..
United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Apr 24, 2018
With evolving patterns, you best option in my opinion is to create your own data irrespective of the past .
This chart is simple string sets to study digit transitions for strategic waging.
A. The digits of each string is PRIORITIZED
B. Transit digits are deleted ONE AT TIME
C. Final string should not be more than 6
P4 Chart
83472
41790
01347
90612
51893
30169
14092
Workout: Say, your input is the set 4288, then transit digits 4,2,8,8 are considered individually from the string chart to form> a string. You do not have to use all the sets.
4>8372, 2>9061, 8>5193, 8>3472
4288 string= 8372906151933472=3790615193372=3337799110652=37910652(to be reduced to 6 length)
keep your observation to the first triad of your final string, reduce triple digits to two when compressing digits to desire length(personal adjustment I should say).
GL
Be mindful that the charted strings are current. select your picks based on how digit/s transits.
WI> 8-5-8-2
8>83472>> hit 2834
8>51893>>hit 2985
5> 51893> hit 2985
2>83472> hit 2834
2>90612
2>14092>>hit 0431
Do you have to use all the strings? No. A strategic wager will focus on max of 2 strings for effective waging.
Effective waging: selecting few picks, max 5 lines, betting considerable amount for few draws. We all know a box bet pays $200 for a $, so start from there to build a bankroll.
Notes A , B and C is there to guild you in filtering in final picks, eg, string 83472, priority is on 8>3>4 ect,
8347-8342-8372-8472.
SC>2-0-1-7
2>83472>> hit 7532, 3879> see priority 8,3,4 validated
2>90612>hit 6905> priority 9,0,6 validated
2>14092> hit 7940>priority 1,4,0,9 validated
Pause, do I need to consider the transit digits 0,1,7? not really,doing much is a distraction, a focus wager will avoid this, why? You don't need distraction when a considerable amount is been waged.
NM>1-8-9-2
1>41790> hit 7192, see 4,1,7,9
1>01347>
1>90612>>hit 7192,4906 see 9,0,6,,
1>51893>> hit 2895,9145 see 5,1,8,9
1> 30169>4906
1> 14092>4906,7192 see 1,4,0,9
Do you need all these strings for the transit 1? no, just two will do. Be a focus wager.
There are many ways to use the chart, always remember the strings are current.
United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Apr 24, 2018
With evolving patterns, you best option in my opinion is to create your own data irrespective of the past .
This chart is simple string sets to study digit transitions for strategic waging.
A. The digits of each string is PRIORITIZED
B. Transit digits are deleted ONE AT TIME
C. Final string should not be more than 6
P4 Chart
83472
41790
01347
90612
51893
30169
14092
Workout: Say, your input is the set 4288, then transit digits 4,2,8,8 are considered individually from the string chart to form> a string. You do not have to use all the sets.
4>8372, 2>9061, 8>5193, 8>3472
4288 string= 8372906151933472=3790615193372=3337799110652=37910652(to be reduced to 6 length)
keep your observation to the first triad of your final string, reduce triple digits to two when compressing digits to desire length(personal adjustment I should say).
GL
The strings are current, always be mindful of this.The normal way is using history and tracking to guess the current string. My ideal is, I do not know the past, but I have the data and the matrix to simulate for forward testing.
MI>3-7-3-7
3>83472>>hit 2433,4027
3> 01347> 4617,4027
3>51893>
3>30169>>6094,3029
Do I need to continue with transit 7?, not really, unless you love distraction.
United States
Member #142,488
May 13, 2013
8,793 Posts
Offline
HI Adobea , I am trying my best to figure this out ... so i am going to use Ohio 6728 as a start number
83472
41790
01347
90612
51893
30169
14092
so do i take the numbers from 6728 and take them out of the above strings.... so in this case if i do that i get
83472 - 34
41790 - 4190
01347 - 0134
90612 - 901
30169 - 3019
51893 - 5193
14092 - 1409
now you say we want to create a string and we dont have to use all sets , how do we know which sets are best to use ? should we just make sure we use sets that cover each of the digits from 6728?
so anyway now im going to use 4 sets to make the string
6>3019 7>0134 2>1409 8>5193
6728 string = 3019013414095193
now when i looked at your example from here your start number was 4288 ... and in notice in your first reduction of the string you took out the 4,2, and 8 .... so for my example with my starting number being 6728 , would i take out those digits from my first string? ... so now i am going to do that ...
3019013414095193 = hmmm... actually i just realized i dont have any of those numbers in my string from my starting number of 6728.... did i not choose the right sets? , or is it ok to reduce my list from here ... if i then put the numbers that are alike together i get this
3019013414095193 = 3330001111999445- if i reduce the list by taking out all the doubles and triples , i get
301945 as my final 6 digit string .... did i do this correctly? .. and when you say keep your observation to the first triad of your string.... does this mean with my string being 301945 ... i would focus on triad 301 ...?
I am trying my best to get this down... your help would be much appreciated ... thank you for sharing your method with us all
winning numbers are found using odds , patterns, history, and a little work - anything else is just a coincidence, unless your psychic..
United States
Member #142,488
May 13, 2013
8,793 Posts
Offline
Ok wait, am i supposed to reduce my string by using numbers from the next drawing? ... i followed the instructions on the first post of this thread , i dont remember seeing that .. unless i missed something
winning numbers are found using odds , patterns, history, and a little work - anything else is just a coincidence, unless your psychic..