"Beginning on Wednesday, April 16,2014 Iowa-specific drawings will be held in both games."
That’s a change from current procedures.
Since Pick 3 was introduced in Iowa in 1998 and Pick 4 was added here in 2003, the Iowa Lottery has shared drawing results in those games with the Illinois Lottery.
"Beginning on Wednesday, April 16,2014 Iowa-specific drawings will be held in both games."
That’s a change from current procedures.
Since Pick 3 was introduced in Iowa in 1998 and Pick 4 was added here in 2003, the Iowa Lottery has shared drawing results in those games with the Illinois Lottery.
Maybe You Can Figure Out Which Direction We Move To.
Let's take Iowa website. They show the draws that they used to share with Illinois when Illinois had ball draws, then Ilinois switched to RNG, Iowa started having own RNG and néw IN draw result sharing. For Iowa official lottery, that's the result that they published as winners. It's their announcement of winning numbers.
In our case for predictions and statistics, I think that it's worth tracking Indiana's ball draws from 2013. I don't believe that we have to use complete Iowa draws published by them.
As Lottobux mentioned, for box predictions lesser history is enough. For straight predictions it's worth including past Indiana results instead of past Iowa results.
With all of these, predictions from both draw results are going to produce hits because lottery is random. Each outcome is independent.
In my other RNG simulation thread I showed RNG seed changes for ball set rotations and also mimicked pre/post draws.
There is weirdness factor in both RNG and ball games...
When we look at statistics we see some kind of short tern and long term patterns.