There is a lot of information here, so read slowly, maybe twice......or more.
I have been working on this for awhile…… it seems that the best tools we have to come up with winning combinations is:
Tracking
Grouping information in a manner to recognize trends and capitalizing on them.
Using this information to recognize triggers to bring a desired result.
So vtracs are either loved or hated……but do provide a way to group numbers to reduce combos to quantities that will bring a good outcome. We know that, like digits, they can go on skips, but rarely stay out long. This gives us an opportunity to focus on certain digits. They also repeat regularly.
I believe…as many others on LP do…..numbers do have association with each other. Vtracs do seem to repeat a lot, meaning we can use this as a tool to recognize trends. Since they are based on mirrors, this means each vtrac digit can bring one of two digits. Can this help us? I think so. I have spent a lot of time tracking and recognizing patterns. I used to think that certain vtrac pairs would bring another. We have recognized this recently with Ladyc743’s post about 01 and 89. Is there more? I think so, just haven’t found them yet. I have some things I’m still working on. I did find something else……
We all know the habit of digits repeating from one draw to another. Rather than focus on that, let’s do the same with vtrac’s. What I found is that while a vtrac digit may repeat from draw to draw, it obviously does not always bring the same digit. So if a pattern emerges, we can use this to reduce our focus from 10 digits to possibly 4 or 2. Does such a pattern exist? YES !!!
I’m sure I am not the only one to see this, but I did not find references to it in searches on LP.
The high and low vtrac, at least one, if not both, repeat draw to draw. And sometimes they don’t….
WHAT?????
Example:
Sat, Mar 11, 2017
|
1-5-3
0-4-7
|
2-5-2
6-9-6
|
Fri, Mar 10, 2017
|
2-3-2
6-7-1
|
2-1-4
1-5-8
|
In this example, the high and low vtracs are what we are looking at. The first draw is a mirror pair consecutive combo. That means 2 of the vtrac digits are the same. (by the way, this type of combo usually brings a double in 3 draws. But tha's another subject) So the vtrac digits are 2 and 3. The vtrac 2 repeats to the next draw, but not as the same digit. In the next draw the high and low vtrac digits are 1 and 4. The vtrac 1 repeats to the next draw, but not as the same digit. The next draw no vtrac digit repeats, and look at that, it’s a double. This is what most often breaks the sequence.
Thu, Mar 16, 2017
|
4-2-2
3-1-6
|
1-2-4
5-6-3
|
Wed, Mar 15, 2017
|
4-5-2
8-9-6
|
1-4-4
0-3-8
|
In this example, the first combo has the low vtrac of 2 and high vtrac of 4. Neither repeat to the next draw. (Another sidenote, see my post about consecutives. One of the two consecutives usually repeats to the next draw. This may influence your choice of vtrac’s to use. I know it would mine.) The next draw has the low vtrac of 1 and the high vtrac of 4. It is a mirror pair combo so two of the vtrac digits are the same. It does copy to the next draw and obviously as one of the digits. This draw’s high and low vtrac’s are 2 and 4. Both vtracs repeat to the next draw and the digit’s repeated are the same.
Is this usable over a long term? I took a grouping of 138 draws in KS history and broke them down. This represents a group just slightly over a two month period. This is long enough to allow things to average out, and still short enough to see trends. In those draws, the low digit did repeat to the next draw 68 times. The high digit repeated 67 times. That means that only 18 times did a vtrac digit not repeat. Not always the same actual digit, but one of two. That’s a significantly higher amount than just a single digit, and we can pinpoint which digit it might be.
So how does this help us?
Well, we all know a digit will repeat draw to draw a certain amount of times. But which digit? This helps us identify which digit it might be. Want to get closer to having more wins? By the way, the number of times the actual digit repeated, marked by the vtrac, either high or low was 83. Just about the usual percentage of repeats. But now we can identify which digit it might be. And we can pinpoint digits to use in case an actual digit does not repeat.
That's your tip!!!
If you have a base group of combinations that you use, you can use this to reduce combinations to a playable amount. Couple that with other filters, and you can reduce more. As with most things we do, it is all about the trend.