$70 million Michigan Powerball winner says lottery winners should be able to remain anonymous

Sep 20, 2023, 5:43 pm (34 comments)

Powerball

Jackpot winner: winning the lottery is too good to be true because of the fallout that comes after

By Kate Northrop

A $70 million Powerball lottery winner from Michigan, who won the jackpot back in 2020, has come forward to argue that lottery winners should be able to choose to remain anonymous.

The winner of a $70 million Powerball jackpot feels strongly based on her own experiences that there should be legislation passed allowing lottery winners to claim a prize without revealing their name.

In 2020, Waterford resident Cristy Davis went from living paycheck-to-paycheck to matching all five numbers plus the Powerball to win a $70 million Powerball jackpot. She opted to collect the one-time lump sum payment of about $36 million after taxes.

"I was just living check to check, staying with my grandma, saving my money, just working at a dealership, driving parts to different dealerships and to auto shops," she said in an interview with The Detroit News.

At the time she bought the winning ticket, Davis was out with her friend, who was buying Daily Three and Daily Four tickets for his aunt and uncle. It encouraged her to withdraw $20 from the ATM to put toward her own tickets for Mega Millions and Powerball, as well as a couple scratch-off games.

The morning after purchasing her tickets, a friend alerted her over FaceTime that the winning Powerball ticket was bought at the Huron Plaza Liquor store on West Huron Street in Pontiac, the same place where she had bought hers.

She pulls out her ticket to check it at her workplace, and she cannot believe what she's seeing.

"My friend Erica's next to me, and she's like, 'No,'" Davis recalled. "I yelled through the whole shop, and everybody came running. It was literally like a three-second excitement, and then it was like, this was too good to be true. It still hasn't clicked in my brain that it's real."

Michigan state law says that lottery players who win more than $10,000 in local, in-state games may claim their prizes without revealing their name, but winners of multi-state games like Mega Millions, Powerball, and Lucky for Life cannot remain anonymous.

"We tried to get a lawyer to see if I can [claim] anonymously, and they said no," Davis continued. "That was my big thing — I didn't want to go on TV. I know so many [who've] been through so much in life, and it was either that or no money."

After her name went public, Davis noticed her identity being used in unscrupulous ways without her consent.

"I've seen in [the] 'Waterford Matters' Facebook group a post: 'This is Cristy Davis, and I'm giving away blah blah blah blah blah... Send me this info to this phone number.' Comments on [the post] are like, 'They cleaned my bank account out.' Why would you give somebody your bank account information?" she related. "And then I have friends on there [replying], 'That's not really her,' saying I'm not on social media, and I changed my name."

Davis argues that this is a perfect example of why lottery winners should not be forced to reveal their names. Concealing the identities of big jackpot winners not only protects the winners themselves, but others who may fall victim to scammers using message of false hope to prey upon unsuspecting individuals, such as the elderly.

"The Lottery people need to know when they expose your name, this is the stuff that happens," she contended. "The Lottery even emailed me like, 'Oh, we heard you're out here scamming people.' I said, 'You know, that's what happens when you expose people's names.'"

"I'm not scamming anybody — I have money," she continued. "Why would I want to hack into somebody's bank account and take their money when they probably have $200 in their bank account? Just leave me alone."

For those that do not want to leave their longtime home, change their name or phone number, and alter their way of life, winning the lottery can come with consequences.

"They definitely should pass the law that allows [lottery winners] to be anonymous because [the Lottery doesn't] realize what they do to people," Davis concluded. "[Winning the lottery] is life-changing already. A lot of people do move away, but some people don't. I didn't. That's probably why I felt the way I did the whole time. It's just too good to be real because of all the stuff that comes after."

VIDEO: Watch the interview

Watch on Rumble

Lottery Post Staff

Comments

noise-gate

I totally agree with Davis. Since no one's goes out of their way to find out if l bought losing tickets,  why should they want to know when l bought a winning  ticket..right?

Brock Lee's avatarBrock Lee

Quote: Originally posted by noise-gate on Sep 20, 2023

I totally agree with Davis. Since no one's goes out of their way to find out if l bought losing tickets,  why should they want to know when l bought a winning  ticket..right?

probably because $100000000 is more interesting than $0.

lottoman626

Maybe the law changed for Michigan after she won. 

billybucks

  Screaming through the dealership wasn't the way to start trying to be anonymous. Or being on Face time or any other social media outlet. She should have told her friend Erica no, It wasn't me and then waited for a snowy Friday afternoon to go claim it and it would be forgotten by most. This was 3 years ago. The story we want from her is what happened since with her good fortune. Doubt if she squandered it. Doesn't have to work or stay with her grandma anymore one would think. Concerned with what was written on a Waterford, Mi. Facebook page seems trite to me to concern yourself with.

Suzy-Dittlenose

Quote: Originally posted by lottoman626 on Sep 20, 2023

Maybe the law changed for Michigan after she won. 

This is a fake map.  There are only 17 states that allow anonymity as of 2023.  🤥

 

AZ, DE, FL, GA, KS, MD, MN, MS, MO, MT, NJ, ND, OH, SC, TX, VA, WV.

kao1632

" [the Lottery doesn't] realize what they do to people "

Oh, I'm sure they do realise.. But they "don't care"..

Publicity (identifying winners) increases sales, which increases revenue.. which probably means bigger bonuses for "someone"...

sully16's avatarsully16

When you buy a lottery ticket, expect your life to change if you win.🤪

hearsetrax's avatarhearsetrax

Quote: Originally posted by sully16 on Sep 21, 2023

When you buy a lottery ticket, expect your life to change if you win.🤪

Todd's avatarTodd

Anyone who wants to understand the current anonymity laws of each state (and a few other countries) can see the complete list at https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/326232

Tony Numbers's avatarTony Numbers

The lotteries justification for revealing winners identities is to prove the lottery is legitimate. I think we can all agree now that the lottery is legit/people win/ and collect. There is no valid reason for them to reveal ones identity. If it's thier money, they won it fair and square, no one needs to know who they are or what they do with it

TheGameGrl's avatarTheGameGrl

I support the "choice" option. 

I lean on the side of transparency .   

Most folks have state laws that deter scamming and or harassment. Utilize that if such transpires. 

The persons/ establishments  I am most likely to be apprehensive about are the ones "managing" the financial.

billybucks

Quote: Originally posted by TheGameGrl on Sep 21, 2023

I support the "choice" option. 

I lean on the side of transparency .   

Most folks have state laws that deter scamming and or harassment. Utilize that if such transpires. 

The persons/ establishments  I am most likely to be apprehensive about are the ones "managing" the financial.

  Just get the word out that everything is in the hands of a financial planner and people will lose interest in your good fortune. Of course that doesn't have to be true and I wouldn't trust these wealth advisers as far as I could throw them.

Artist77's avatarArtist77

Remember in an analysis of anonymity for a state, it is not typically just a yes or no like Maryland where it is 100% anonymous and they stress that fact.

Anonymity can be limited based on a time period and/or amount won, type of game, and subject to state FOIA and similar laws.

Or if a state says no to anonymity, it MAY allow you to claim via a llc or trust.  And whether your name is released as the winner will also vary.

So it is not just a simple yes or no answer.

Think's avatarThink

Quote: Originally posted by lottoman626 on Sep 20, 2023

Maybe the law changed for Michigan after she won. 

Nope! Michigan should be in the Purple set.

You can stay anonymous on state games but not the multistate games...clearly!

Subscribe to this news story