I, for one, am really glad to see this issue raised again in Indiana. There has already been one attempt to legislate computerized drawings out of existence there, maybe (hopefully!) this will spark another attempt. I hope it also gets notice in Tennessee, where the oversight meeting is just a couple of weeks away.
the lotto in my state of indiana is doing something dirty with this constant not hitting on the jackpot but ima just play my tickets and pray for the best
Im glad someone finally put a percentage on the likelihood of this happening at well below one percent. If Tennessee had a computer glitch that didnt allow doubles maybe Indiana has a glitch that doesnt allow the same numbers to be drawn if they were printed on a ticket, hence no doubles either haha. It surpassed the magical 50 million mark, now the year mark might be the magical date this falls. And no money is won when you hit 2 numbers, just a free play that is in itself worth about 20 cents, typical lottery spin.
Quote: Originally posted by Todd on Oct 17, 2007
I, for one, am really glad to see this issue raised again in Indiana. There has already been one attempt to legislate computerized drawings out of existence there, maybe (hopefully!) this will spark another attempt. I hope it also gets notice in Tennessee, where the oversight meeting is just a couple of weeks away.
I completly agree with you on this issue computerized drawings are not good for the players .The benifit is too the Lotterys and their corporate partners ....its a money maker very little payouts and all profit :
laws would push those Corporate Enterprises into a better system a ball draw in the eye of the camera and the citizens of this state:
But like I said before there are many insidences accross the USA where no one has won for over a year ....people dont want to make waves ....(just ask KY Fooled ,he hits all the web sites) case and point the pick 10 NY cash amount for all 10 =500,000.00
with up to 10 winners per draw ....number of winners for all ten in the last 5yr =( 2)
and you never know if that winner was not related to the lottery personal ,since it is a draw that is never teleivised;
Quote: Originally posted by SmoothJuice on Oct 18, 2007
IT'S completely driving me Insane!!!!!
why dont you write to the Governor or the inspector general of your state ;
tell them you dont want computerized drawings in your state ...its simple and you are paying there wages just like every-other tax payers;
"A journey of a thousand- miles begins with a single step"
Quote: Originally posted by computerhead723 on Oct 18, 2007
why dont you write to the Governor or the inspector general of your state ;
tell them you dont want computerized drawings in your state ...its simple and you are paying there wages just like every-other tax payers;
"A journey of a thousand- miles begins with a single step"
FYI-- Everyone has been notified years ago. The day that the bill to eliminate RNG was supposed to be brought up in the Legislature was the day they all walked out---isnt that a coincidence. You plead in vain if u live in Indiana. Rule of law is non existent here. EVERYONE HAS BEEN NOTIFIED! Since the Lottery is now getting scrutiny expect it to be won now. How do I know that? Cause when someone brought up the fact that there had not been quads in so long then the quads came out. There is NOTHING random about it. Just look at the daily game payouts and compare them too ANY State. It is hideously insane. But they are untouchable. Indiana makes Tennessee look like Cinderella.
we're in the same boat jeff.i don't spend and won't spend another dime until tennessee brings back balls.period.
i'm predicting that the lotto jackpot will be hit this saturday (hopefully by me) it will be the one year anniversary since it was won (actually 364 days but who cares)
Quote: Originally posted by computerhead723 on Oct 18, 2007
I completly agree with you on this issue computerized drawings are not good for the players .The benifit is too the Lotterys and their corporate partners ....its a money maker very little payouts and all profit :
laws would push those Corporate Enterprises into a better system a ball draw in the eye of the camera and the citizens of this state:
But like I said before there are many insidences accross the USA where no one has won for over a year ....people dont want to make waves ....(just ask KY Fooled ,he hits all the web sites) case and point the pick 10 NY cash amount for all 10 =500,000.00
with up to 10 winners per draw ....number of winners for all ten in the last 5yr =( 2)
and you never know if that winner was not related to the lottery personal ,since it is a draw that is never teleivised;
my information was incorrect about the NY pick 10 ..for this year there has been a few more winners ,they dont tell you on the news anything so here is the facts for getting all 10 or the largest payouts ever!!!
Winning Numbers Drawn | Total Payout | ||||||||||
02/27/2005 | 2 | 9 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | $1,510,182 |
06/26/2007 | 2 | 17 | 23 | 25 | 38 | 39 | 41 | 44 | 46 | 47 | $1,032,878 |
07/04/2007 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 23 | 26 | 28 | 37 | 41 | $1,026,006 |
02/12/2004 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 31 | 39 | $596,408 |
02/16/2007 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 29 | 34 | $560,386 |
04/25/2006 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 28 | 32 | $557,618 |
09/27/2005 | 7 | 11 | 17 | 20 | 23 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 31 | 37 | $547,028 |
09/01/2005 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 19 | 26 | 28 | $545,340 |
05/04/2004 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 22 | 38 | 45 | 48 | 54 | $543,480 |
03/15/2003 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 21 | 28 | 31 | 36 | $541,930 |
09/04/2006 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 20 | 30 | 32 | $541,664 |
02/04/2006 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 25 | 26 | 28 | $538,698 |
03/01/2007 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 22 | 33 | 37 | $536,254 |
08/09/2004 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 23 | 27 | 29 | 36 | 39 | $536,168 |
10/02/2007 | 7 | 8 | 19 | 21 | 24 | 25 | 29 | 30 | 32 | 33 | $535,522 |
04/09/2006 | 7 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 24 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 40 | 43 | $533,746 |
02/21/2007 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 19 | 23 | 27 | 32 | 34 | $531,682 |
01/31/2007 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 20 | 25 | 28 | 32 | 38 | $531,460 |
10/15/2006 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 17 | 20 | 27 | 31 | 32 | 34 | 36 | $530,204 |
12/04/2005 | 8 | 10 | 25 | 32 | 39 | 42 | 57 | 58 | 60 | 65 | $191,610 |
11/19/2003 | 7 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 52 | 53 | 59 | $165,048 |
10/24/2002 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 22 | 24 | $112,224 |
10/21/2005 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 22 | 25 | $106,034 |
05/24/2004 | 17 | 23 | 25 | 28 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | $103,300 |
08/04/2007 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 19 | $94,994 |
06/10/2006 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 19 | 23 | $94,598 |
02/15/2007 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 23 | 26 | $93,332 |
04/01/2004 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 25 | 26 | $91,206 |
Yes that is a long time. But you do have to look at the odds. I mean if the jackpot is really this high and they are only selling about $1.5 million tickets a drawing, that is a lot of uncovered combinations. Now for how long this has been growing the odds are probably pretty small that it would have lasted this long. But odds are odds. I really don't see how it could be a fraction of a percent though. I mean when the jackpot is small it seems like they don't sell many tickets at all.
But by the way the jackpot only grows by $500,000 a drawing? When they are selling $3,000,000 tickets a week the jackpot should be increase by at least $2,000,000 a week not only $1,000,000. But I guess it does make up for the beginning jackpots when I doubt they sell enough tickets to warrant the $500,000 increase.
Brad
Ohio's Classic Lotto, a 6/49 game has a starting jackpot of $1M and is increased by $100K each drawing that it's not won. Unlike Hoosier Lotto which offer a free play for matching 2, its lowest prize is $2 for a match3.
Since the Hoosier Lotto payouts(10/17/07=$195K)is higher than Ohio Classic Lotto payouts(10/17/07=$22K), I assume it's attracting more players, however the Ohio game jackpot has been won three times since it started less than a year ago. It's truly is a mystery why the Hoosier Lotto game has gone so long without a jackpot winner.
P.S. Ohio Classic Lotto picks its numbers the old fashion way, it uses a ball machine.
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Oct 18, 2007
Ohio's Classic Lotto, a 6/49 game has a starting jackpot of $1M and is increased by $100K each drawing that it's not won. Unlike Hoosier Lotto which offer a free play for matching 2, its lowest prize is $2 for a match3.
Since the Hoosier Lotto payouts(10/17/07=$195K)is higher than Ohio Classic Lotto payouts(10/17/07=$22K), I assume it's attracting more players, however the Ohio game jackpot has been won three times since it started less than a year ago. It's truly is a mystery why the Hoosier Lotto game has gone so long without a jackpot winner.
P.S. Ohio Classic Lotto picks its numbers the old fashion way, it uses a ball machine.
A mystery? Hardly. One needs only to look at the 0 straight winners on pic 4 every day and the ridiculously low pic 3 payouts. The mystery becomes obvious.
![]() © 2021 Speednet Group LLC Lottery Post is a registered trademark of Speednet Group. |
Welcome Guest
Your last visit: Sun, Mar 7, 2021, 9:19 pm