Formula for probable recurrent points for lottery/lottoPrev Topic Next Topic

adobea78

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Nov 9, 2013, 8:46 pm

This is a tentative formula derived from ' finding the next term' in a sequence. Whether such sequence is linear or not is left to observation. I use the word 'tentative' to avoid any equivocation . I will replace the Nth term, with Nth set/s since we're dealing with sets. These sets may be your PICKS to wage or a BASE to work on.

Lets go> Every lotto/lottery game has a POOL, with members ranging from lowest to highest, eg, cash 5 has lowest member 1 and highest 39(5/39>5 balls from pool of 39 balls), lottery games are usually 1 to highest 9(a ball from 9 balls). Let's set the variable N for the limit of the POOL. For any game , the format is x/N, where x is/are unknown variable/s to be drawn, for simplicity, i will assume the Linear dimension(yes I understand the dynamics of other dimensions), hence the variables will be drawn>Xo,X1........Xn. So for every draw set my Nth set will be >[(X1-X2),(X1-X2)+2 ,N-(X1-X2), N-(X1-X2)+2] . Note that X could be X3 ....Xn,

X1 and X2 assumes the variable X follows a linear sequence. The number 2 is deviation range for the variable X.

Now lets plug in some numbers using assumed cash 5 draw > 1-22-34-15-20:

X1=1, X2=22

[(1-2),(1-2)+2, 39-(1-2), 39-(1-2)+2]>1,3,38,40

X1=22, X2=34

[(22-34),(22-34)+2, 39-(22-34), 39-(22-34)+2]>12,14,27,29

X1=34,X2=15, N=39

[(34-15),(34-15)+2, 39-(34-15),39-(34-15)+2]>19,21,20,22

X1=15, X2=20, N=39

[(15-20),(15-20)+2, 39-(15-20), 39-(15-20)+2]>5,7,34,36

Picks>

1,3,38

12,14,27,29

19,21,20,22

5,7,34,36

This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games and very effective for lottery games also.

Ideals are always welcome, keep your thoughts if you only find faults, am open to positive critique and ideals.

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Nov 9, 2013, 9:28 pm

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 9, 2013

This is a tentative formula derived from ' finding the next term' in a sequence. Whether such sequence is linear or not is left to observation. I use the word 'tentative' to avoid any equivocation . I will replace the Nth term, with Nth set/s since we're dealing with sets. These sets may be your PICKS to wage or a BASE to work on.

Lets go> Every lotto/lottery game has a POOL, with members ranging from lowest to highest, eg, cash 5 has lowest member 1 and highest 39(5/39>5 balls from pool of 39 balls), lottery games are usually 1 to highest 9(a ball from 9 balls). Let's set the variable N for the limit of the POOL. For any game , the format is x/N, where x is/are unknown variable/s to be drawn, for simplicity, i will assume the Linear dimension(yes I understand the dynamics of other dimensions), hence the variables will be drawn>Xo,X1........Xn. So for every draw set my Nth set will be >[(X1-X2),(X1-X2)+2 ,N-(X1-X2), N-(X1-X2)+2] . Note that X could be X3 ....Xn,

X1 and X2 assumes the variable X follows a linear sequence. The number 2 is deviation range for the variable X.

Now lets plug in some numbers using assumed cash 5 draw > 1-22-34-15-20:

X1=1, X2=22

[(1-2),(1-2)+2, 39-(1-2), 39-(1-2)+2]>1,3,38,40

X1=22, X2=34

[(22-34),(22-34)+2, 39-(22-34), 39-(22-34)+2]>12,14,27,29

X1=34,X2=15, N=39

[(34-15),(34-15)+2, 39-(34-15),39-(34-15)+2]>19,21,20,22

X1=15, X2=20, N=39

[(15-20),(15-20)+2, 39-(15-20), 39-(15-20)+2]>5,7,34,36

Picks>

1,3,38

12,14,27,29

19,21,20,22

5,7,34,36

This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games and very effective for lottery games also.

Ideals are always welcome, keep your thoughts if you only find faults, am open to positive critique and ideals.

Let's use ONE draw State like Wisconsin to test the formula.

Pick 3		Pick 4
Midday	Evening	Midday	Evening
Sat, Nov 9, 2013	3-4-5	7-1-3-8
Fri, Nov 8, 2013	0-9-8	7-0-2-8
Thu, Nov 7, 2013	0-6-8	5-4-8-0
Wed, Nov 6, 2013	1-8-4	7-4-3-9
Tue, Nov 5, 2013	6-4-3	4-4-9-8
Mon, Nov 4, 2013	7-5-4	1-9-0-9
Sun, Nov 3, 2013	9-2-3	7-8-3-1
Sat, Nov 2, 2013	0-2-4	7-0-5-3
Fri, Nov 1, 2013	5-7-3	8-3-9-4
Thu, Oct 31, 2013	4-2-1	4-8-0-2

Plug in draw variables:

4-2-1> 2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

5-7-3>2,4,7,9,4,6,5,7>2479-4657

0,2,4>2,4,7,9,2,4,7,9>2479-2479

9,2,3>7,9,2,4,1,3,8,0>7924-1380

7,5,4>2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

Do you see any pattern evolving after x sets of draws? 2479

Now observe the above data, working on one set at time, be mindful this a target wage!

Plug in variables:

4-8-0-2> 4657-8013-2479

8-3-9-4> 5746-6835-5746

7-0-5-3>7924-5746-2479

7-8-3-1>1380-5746-2479

Do you see any Pattern evolving? 4657-2479

adobea78

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Nov 9, 2013, 10:02 pm

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 9, 2013

Let's use ONE draw State like Wisconsin to test the formula.

Pick 3		Pick 4
Midday	Evening	Midday	Evening
Sat, Nov 9, 2013	3-4-5	7-1-3-8
Fri, Nov 8, 2013	0-9-8	7-0-2-8
Thu, Nov 7, 2013	0-6-8	5-4-8-0
Wed, Nov 6, 2013	1-8-4	7-4-3-9
Tue, Nov 5, 2013	6-4-3	4-4-9-8
Mon, Nov 4, 2013	7-5-4	1-9-0-9
Sun, Nov 3, 2013	9-2-3	7-8-3-1
Sat, Nov 2, 2013	0-2-4	7-0-5-3
Fri, Nov 1, 2013	5-7-3	8-3-9-4
Thu, Oct 31, 2013	4-2-1	4-8-0-2

Plug in draw variables:

4-2-1> 2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

5-7-3>2,4,7,9,4,6,5,7>2479-4657

0,2,4>2,4,7,9,2,4,7,9>2479-2479

9,2,3>7,9,2,4,1,3,8,0>7924-1380

7,5,4>2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

Do you see any pattern evolving after x sets of draws? 2479

Now observe the above data, working on one set at time, be mindful this a target wage!

Plug in variables:

4-8-0-2> 4657-8013-2479

8-3-9-4> 5746-6835-5746

7-0-5-3>7924-5746-2479

7-8-3-1>1380-5746-2479

Do you see any Pattern evolving? 4657-2479

Let s take one set at time and just filter via next draw,note your Remnant for your x

421 >2479-1380 fiter by 573> 24x9-1x80(Remnant 53,57

Picks 24x,29x,18x10x, where x=5>3>7

573>2479-4657 filter by 024>xx79-x657(remnant 0,02)Picks x79-65x-67x-57x

024>2479>filter923>x47(Remnant 3)picks x47

Remnant is simplist way of digit anaylsis without charts, is on going during workout, after

three workout my remnants are 5,3,5,7,0,0,2,3, and most of the time your elusive x is the

remnant

adobea78

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Nov 9, 2013, 10:38 pm

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 9, 2013
Let s take one set at time and just filter via next draw,note your Remnant for your x

421 >2479-1380 fiter by 573> 24x9-1x80(Remnant 53,57

Picks 24x,29x,18x10x, where x=5>3>7

573>2479-4657 filter by 024>xx79-x657(remnant 0,02)Picks x79-65x-67x-57x

024>2479>filter923>x47(Remnant 3)picks x47

Remnant is simplist way of digit anaylsis without charts, is on going during workout, after

three workout my remnants are 5,3,5,7,0,0,2,3, and most of the time your elusive x is the

remnant

Since the assumption of the formula is linear in dimension, your picks should follow such dimension, this take care of positional picks most of the time. let's take above draw(see text) set 421 >2479-1380, convert it to a three set format>

247

913

80

filter by 573

24x

91x

80x
adobea78

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Nov 11, 2013, 3:34 pm

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 9, 2013
This is a tentative formula derived from ' finding the next term' in a sequence. Whether such sequence is linear or not is left to observation. I use the word 'tentative' to avoid any equivocation . I will replace the Nth term, with Nth set/s since we're dealing with sets. These sets may be your PICKS to wage or a BASE to work on.

Lets go> Every lotto/lottery game has a POOL, with members ranging from lowest to highest, eg, cash 5 has lowest member 1 and highest 39(5/39>5 balls from pool of 39 balls), lottery games are usually 1 to highest 9(a ball from 9 balls). Let's set the variable N for the limit of the POOL. For any game , the format is x/N, where x is/are unknown variable/s to be drawn, for simplicity, i will assume the Linear dimension(yes I understand the dynamics of other dimensions), hence the variables will be drawn>Xo,X1........Xn. So for every draw set my Nth set will be >[(X1-X2),(X1-X2)+2 ,N-(X1-X2), N-(X1-X2)+2] . Note that X could be X3 ....Xn,

X1 and X2 assumes the variable X follows a linear sequence. The number 2 is deviation range for the variable X.

Now lets plug in some numbers using assumed cash 5 draw > 1-22-34-15-20:

X1=1, X2=22

[(1-2),(1-2)+2, 39-(1-2), 39-(1-2)+2]>1,3,38,40

X1=22, X2=34

[(22-34),(22-34)+2, 39-(22-34), 39-(22-34)+2]>12,14,27,29

X1=34,X2=15, N=39

[(34-15),(34-15)+2, 39-(34-15),39-(34-15)+2]>19,21,20,22

X1=15, X2=20, N=39

[(15-20),(15-20)+2, 39-(15-20), 39-(15-20)+2]>5,7,34,36

Picks>

1,3,38

12,14,27,29

19,21,20,22

5,7,34,36

This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games and very effective for lottery games also.

Ideals are always welcome, keep your thoughts if you only find faults, am open to positive critique and ideals.

The best way to use the formula is to convert the results in $STRING, eg. if my draw set is 338 my end picks will be 0,2,9,1-5,7,4,6 >$string 02915746, now you have two options of filtering, you can start with draw set or the next set(remember to note the Remnants while filtering).

NB> Members of string are POSITIONAL.

adobea78

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Nov 11, 2013, 4:00 pm

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 11, 2013

The best way to use the formula is to convert the results in $STRING, eg. if my draw set is 338 my end picks will be 0,2,9,1-5,7,4,6 >$string 02915746, now you have two options of filtering, you can start with draw set or the next set(remember to note the Remnants while filtering).

NB> Members of string are POSITIONAL.

Lets take CT data to illustrate the string workout using formula.

Pick 3		Pick 4
Midday	Evening	Midday	Evening
Mon, Nov 11, 2013	8-2-9	1-2-6-0
Sun, Nov 10, 2013	2-8-9	8-0-1	7-6-3-8	3-2-2-9
Sat, Nov 9, 2013	4-5-1	3-0-1	3-9-5-7	2-7-4-8
Fri, Nov 8, 2013	7-0-2	1-5-4	2-3-2-7	0-3-2-0
Thu, Nov 7, 2013	6-6-8	9-6-2	2-6-5-2	2-1-3-1
Wed, Nov 6, 2013	8-8-5	2-5-0	1-1-4-4	7-2-6-6
Tue, Nov 5, 2013	6-9-3	7-5-0	8-3-6-1	0-3-6-9
Mon, Nov 4, 2013	2-9-5	8-6-4	1-3-2-3	5-8-3-2
Sun, Nov 3, 2013	7-6-1	1-9-5	6-0-2-8	7-2-9-5
Sat, Nov 2, 2013	9-6-0	2-5-0	5-9-2-4	2-7-3-2

Start with P4, filtering will be combined draws>

2-7-3-2> 5746-4657-1380>filter by 6058>74-47-13(remnants 0,8,0,8,6,5)

74-47-13>filter by 7295>4-4-13(Remnants 2,9,5,2,9,5)

4-4-1-3(this is your base to wage.)

5-9-2-4>4657-7924-2479 >filter by 2732>465-94-49 (Remnants 2,3,3,3)

465-94-49 > filter by 6028>45-94-49 (0,2,8)

459449

NB> note the Remnant pattern!

Lottonomics

United States
Member #133,651
October 5, 2012
82 Posts
Offline

Nov 11, 2013, 5:56 pm

When you say "This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games" Do you mean just testing on paper or with actual numbers purchased and in play?

I've been doing a similar thing as you with generating smaller "play pools" with promising results on paper, but once the numbers are actually purchased and put into play the constant 3 numbers stop coming.

It's a curious phenomenon. I play, it stops working, I don't play, it starts working again. I'm just wondering if you have experienced this with your method? I look forward to reading more about it.
adobea78

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Nov 11, 2013, 7:28 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Lottonomics on Nov 11, 2013
When you say "This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games" Do you mean just testing on paper or with actual numbers purchased and in play?

I've been doing a similar thing as you with generating smaller "play pools" with promising results on paper, but once the numbers are actually purchased and put into play the constant 3 numbers stop coming.

It's a curious phenomenon. I play, it stops working, I don't play, it starts working again. I'm just wondering if you have experienced this with your method? I look forward to reading more about it.

Backtesting can be biased. Most at times, we turn to work towards a known data, this creates inconsistency. I suggest you take any 10 draw sets and do a separate backtest without looking at actual results.
bigdaddy

BETWEEN OAKRIDGE AND WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB
United States
Member #1,647
June 10, 2003
3,387 Posts
Offline

Nov 11, 2013, 7:54 pm

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 9, 2013
This is a tentative formula derived from ' finding the next term' in a sequence. Whether such sequence is linear or not is left to observation. I use the word 'tentative' to avoid any equivocation . I will replace the Nth term, with Nth set/s since we're dealing with sets. These sets may be your PICKS to wage or a BASE to work on.

Lets go> Every lotto/lottery game has a POOL, with members ranging from lowest to highest, eg, cash 5 has lowest member 1 and highest 39(5/39>5 balls from pool of 39 balls), lottery games are usually 1 to highest 9(a ball from 9 balls). Let's set the variable N for the limit of the POOL. For any game , the format is x/N, where x is/are unknown variable/s to be drawn, for simplicity, i will assume the Linear dimension(yes I understand the dynamics of other dimensions), hence the variables will be drawn>Xo,X1........Xn. So for every draw set my Nth set will be >[(X1-X2),(X1-X2)+2 ,N-(X1-X2), N-(X1-X2)+2] . Note that X could be X3 ....Xn,

X1 and X2 assumes the variable X follows a linear sequence. The number 2 is deviation range for the variable X.

Now lets plug in some numbers using assumed cash 5 draw > 1-22-34-15-20:

X1=1, X2=22

[(1-2),(1-2)+2, 39-(1-2), 39-(1-2)+2]>1,3,38,40

X1=22, X2=34

[(22-34),(22-34)+2, 39-(22-34), 39-(22-34)+2]>12,14,27,29

X1=34,X2=15, N=39

[(34-15),(34-15)+2, 39-(34-15),39-(34-15)+2]>19,21,20,22

X1=15, X2=20, N=39

[(15-20),(15-20)+2, 39-(15-20), 39-(15-20)+2]>5,7,34,36

Picks>

1,3,38

12,14,27,29

19,21,20,22

5,7,34,36

This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games and very effective for lottery games also.

Ideals are always welcome, keep your thoughts if you only find faults, am open to positive critique and ideals.

X/pi+yyy already accomplishes that

Relax,Bigdaddy has your number

turning $30 or less into thousands everyday!!

here we go steelers ..here we go---------stairway to seven

TIME FOR THE LOMBARDI TROPHY TO COME HOME..
adobea78

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Nov 11, 2013, 8:07 pm

Quote: Originally posted by bigdaddy on Nov 11, 2013
X/pi+yyy already accomplishes that

Elaborate, link will be nice.
RJOh

100

mid-Ohio
United States
Member #9
March 24, 2001
20,272 Posts
Offline

Nov 11, 2013, 8:09 pm

Quote: Originally posted by Lottonomics on Nov 11, 2013
When you say "This outcome gives constant 3/5 for lotto games" Do you mean just testing on paper or with actual numbers purchased and in play?

I've been doing a similar thing as you with generating smaller "play pools" with promising results on paper, but once the numbers are actually purchased and put into play the constant 3 numbers stop coming.

It's a curious phenomenon. I play, it stops working, I don't play, it starts working again. I'm just wondering if you have experienced this with your method? I look forward to reading more about it.

There no reason what you do on paper shouldn't work the same in reality. Next time when you're doing it on paper post the results on the prediction board too. If it works on the prediction board and on paper, chances are it will work in reality.

* you don't need to buy every combination, just the winning ones *
bigdaddy

BETWEEN OAKRIDGE AND WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB
United States
Member #1,647
June 10, 2003
3,387 Posts
Offline

Nov 11, 2013, 8:15 pm

Look at kolas rings of pi system or search for pi threads..i do something different than most do and am patenting my process

Relax,Bigdaddy has your number

turning $30 or less into thousands everyday!!

here we go steelers ..here we go---------stairway to seven

TIME FOR THE LOMBARDI TROPHY TO COME HOME..
adobea78

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Nov 11, 2013, 8:17 pm

Quote: Originally posted by bigdaddy on Nov 11, 2013
Look at kolas rings of pi system or search for pi threads..i do something different than most do and am patenting my process

Thanks, will take a look.

adobea78

United States
Member #116,339
September 8, 2011
5,094 Posts
Offline

Nov 11, 2013, 11:16 pm

Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 9, 2013

Let's use ONE draw State like Wisconsin to test the formula.

Pick 3		Pick 4
Midday	Evening	Midday	Evening
Sat, Nov 9, 2013	3-4-5	7-1-3-8
Fri, Nov 8, 2013	0-9-8	7-0-2-8
Thu, Nov 7, 2013	0-6-8	5-4-8-0
Wed, Nov 6, 2013	1-8-4	7-4-3-9
Tue, Nov 5, 2013	6-4-3	4-4-9-8
Mon, Nov 4, 2013	7-5-4	1-9-0-9
Sun, Nov 3, 2013	9-2-3	7-8-3-1
Sat, Nov 2, 2013	0-2-4	7-0-5-3
Fri, Nov 1, 2013	5-7-3	8-3-9-4
Thu, Oct 31, 2013	4-2-1	4-8-0-2

Plug in draw variables:

4-2-1> 2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

5-7-3>2,4,7,9,4,6,5,7>2479-4657

0,2,4>2,4,7,9,2,4,7,9>2479-2479

9,2,3>7,9,2,4,1,3,8,0>7924-1380

7,5,4>2,4,7,9,1,3,8,0>2479-1380

Do you see any pattern evolving after x sets of draws? 2479

Now observe the above data, working on one set at time, be mindful this a target wage!

Plug in variables:

4-8-0-2> 4657-8013-2479

8-3-9-4> 5746-6835-5746

7-0-5-3>7924-5746-2479

7-8-3-1>1380-5746-2479

Do you see any Pattern evolving? 4657-2479

421>24791380>247-249-241-243-248-240-479-471-473-478-470-791-793-798-790

913-918-910-912-914-917-138-130-132-134-137-380-382-384-387

filter by 573>249-241-248-240-918-910-912-914-

filter by 024>918-910(be careful here)

573>24794657>247-249-244-246-245-479-474-476-475-477-794-796-795-797-946-945-947

942-465-467-464-657-652-659

filter by 024>796-795-657-659

filter by 923>657(be careful)

Is all about target wage, get a base by propulsion!

Gwoof

Horwood NL
Canada
Member #70,611
February 6, 2009
726 Posts
Offline

Nov 12, 2013, 8:53 am

In your example,X1=1, X2=22, on the first line what happened to "22" ?

[(1-2),(1-2)+2, 39-(1-2), 39-(1-2)+2]>1,3,38,40

New Topic New Poll

Subscribe to this topic

Formula for probable recurrent points for lottery/lottoPrev TopicNext Topic

Formula for probable recurrent points for lottery/lottoPrev Topic Next Topic