We need some quantum physics implemented in the predictions software.
In addition we probably need PC hardware(working together with the prediction software) which is able to peek into the future.
The only problem I can see with that is that the balls in lottery drawings appear to perform somewhat to electrons described in a theorem known as Bell's Inequality. Einstein's fixed universe, full of rules and patterns everything has to obey at every level from sub-atomic upward, was conclusively disproved in 1974, by Stuart Freedom and John Clauser at Berkely. Again, a lot more precisely a short time later by Alain Aspect at the University of Paris during the early '80s.
Those of us who'd like the universe and reality to settle down and behave itself, follow rules, whether we happen to be paying attention or not, aren't likely to come out of Quantum physics any happier about the state of the universe. We aren't going to be devising any software that can hit a moving target that knows when we take aim and dodges, as happens with both electrons and pingpong balls painted with numbers.
At least, so it seems to me. I'd add as an afterthought, that might be one of the reasons the big jackpots are won by Quick Picks, rather than by those of us who have a lot of fancy software, or who study the numbers, the patterns, and line our sights up on them every draw. I don't discount the obvious fact that a lot more QPs are sold, but those of us who study those numbers and see the patterns ought to be winning better than we do in a more righteous universe.
Jack