Quote: Originally posted by Todd on Apr 30, 2012
Trains and subways might zip along a little faster in Philadelphia this week after a group of 48 transit workers hit a $172 million Powerball lottery jackpot.
The workers, who will get about $3 million apiece, are choosing to remain anonymous, but range in rank from senior managers in the purchasing department to "a favorite janitor," according to Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) spokesman Richard Maloney.
"They have all asked to be anonymous on this. When you get a windfall, it's easy to be joyous for a second, and then, you know, you don't want everybody in the world to know," Maloney said.
A worker leaving SEPTA headquarters said "no comment" and it was clear he was not changing his mind.
"Some are talking about retiring; some have already said 'no, we're going to continue working.' It's a lot of money, but if you're a young person that's not a whole lot of money," Maloney said.
The workers range in experience with the company, from just under a year to close to 40 years service, and all work in the headquarters in Philadelphia. The "floating pool" the workers took part in has been going on for years, with certain members joining in or sitting a week out depending on personal choice, Maloney said.
It turns out, an IT technician who usual contributes to the pool did not this time.
"She didn't pay up recently, they sent her an email and she didn't respond so she was out on the winnings," SEPTA employee Mitch Schwed said.
Maloney said the 48 SEPTA employees range the whole gamut of workers from upper management, finance, purchasing and union members.
This week, for the $172 million Powerball, workers each put in $5 to buy 120 tickets.
The winning ticket was sold three blocks down from SEPTA headquarters at the News Stand at the Gallery, 9th and Market streets in Center City.
"We're excited to have sold this jackpot-winning Powerball ticket in Pennsylvania, and this will be the second Powerball jackpot we get to award in just five months," Pennsylvania Lottery Executive Director Todd Rucci said. "Today also marks the 23rd anniversary of the April 26, 1989, Super 7 drawing that awarded $115.5 million to 14 winning tickets and still holds the record as the largest jackpot awarded by the Lottery."
Maloney said that despite winning it big this week, no employees had tendered their resignation or booked trips to Hawaii yet.
"Not so far. While it's a lot of money for anybody, for a young person who still has a career, to continue working, it's a nice cushion. If they're nearing retirement, it's a nice nest egg," Maloney said.
Many of the winners worked on the 11th floor, in purchasing, he noted, and are well-versed in managing finances.
"You go up there, you feel the vibe. It's just so great just to walk up on the floor, just to hear somebody that close to you won," SEPTA employee Cynthia Griffin said.
One of the winners was a janitor which thrilled his buddies on the custodial staff.
"I'm very happy he won, he always said when he wins, he wins it with a whole lot of money and he done it today," coworker Wanda Alexander said.
Maloney said some of the winners were very coy about their new found wealth, while others were "dancing in the hallway."
The Pennsylvania Lottery said that no winners had officially come forward yet.
"We're excited to have sold this jackpot-winning Powerball ticket in Pennsylvania, and this will be the second Powerball jackpot we get to award in just five months," Pennsylvania Lottery Executive Director Todd Rucci said. "Today also marks the 23rd anniversary of the April 26, 1989, Super 7 drawing that awarded $115.5 million to 14 winning tickets and still holds the record as the largest jackpot awarded by the Lottery."
On Thursday, standing in front of the store where the winning Powerball ticket was sold, Rucci presented the owner of the News Stand at the Gallery with a $100,000 check for selling that jackpot-winning ticket. Rucci said the store had been a lottery retailer since 2001.
The Powerball winning numbers for Wed., Apr. 25 were 4, 25, 29, 34, and 43, with Powerball number 29.
Powerball drawings are held each Wednesday and Saturday night at 11:00 pm Eastern Time. The winning numbers are published at USA Mega (www.usamega.com) minutes after the drawing.
Congrats to the Lucky 48!
They won $3m each I won $3- lol!
No info provided on how many tickets were bought by the pool and I'm guessing here it was a QP!
I smell a lawsuit from the lady who didn't pay up this time around.I hop that I'm wrong,but....
Congratulations to the other 48 winners.
Wow that is Great one of these days We will ........... Congrats to the $48 Winners!
Quote: Originally posted by dpoly1 on Apr 30, 2012
Congrats to the Philly Bums.
Should have been yours dpoly. Won't these bums listen to reason?
Great win.....CONGRATS to the lucky 48...............wonder when the conspiracy theorists will try to create chaos out this one ? Kudos to the winners
How wonderful, 48 people getting a sudden boost to their bank accounts. Congratulations to all!
Quote: Originally posted by CDanaT on Apr 30, 2012
Great win.....CONGRATS to the lucky 48...............wonder when the conspiracy theorists will try to create chaos out this one ? Kudos to the winners
Thy've already been on the offense and launched their first attack CD. It's one of the oldest conspiracies about the "East Coast", winning
all the time.
I think what they need is a good old fashioned to cool them off.
Quote: Originally posted by dpoly1 on Apr 30, 2012
Congrats to the Philly Bums.
Congrats to the lucky winners! It's always nice to hear city workers winning.
Hater! ^ SMH.
Quote: Originally posted by Cletu$2 on Apr 30, 2012
I smell a lawsuit from the lady who didn't pay up this time around.I hop that I'm wrong,but....
Congratulations to the other 48 winners.
The "floating pool" the workers took part in has been going on for years, with certain members joining in or sitting a week out depending on personal choice, Maloney said.
The lady's personal choice was to sit that week out, she doesn't get to change her mind after it's over.
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Apr 30, 2012
The "floating pool" the workers took part in has been going on for years, with certain members joining in or sitting a week out depending on personal choice, Maloney said.
The lady's personal choice was to sit that week out, she doesn't get to change her mind after it's over.
Exactly. All she can do is be happy for her colleagues.
They would be smart to offer some type of settlement to the lady who did not play
Most likely she will file some sort of lawsuit
Save the time and the money and pay her off, right or wrong it will be for the best in the long run
Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on Apr 30, 2012
The "floating pool" the workers took part in has been going on for years, with certain members joining in or sitting a week out depending on personal choice, Maloney said.
The lady's personal choice was to sit that week out, she doesn't get to change her mind after it's over.
Personally,I agree with you,RJOH.But I can just see the lawyers chomping at the bit to try to get her to sue...so they can get a third of her winnings.Happens almost all the time when a pool wins.
Quote: Originally posted by VenomV12 on May 1, 2012
Not everyone on here publicizes what they make or what they have so don't assume you are the only one.
$1.5 million is more than sufficient to retire/semi-retire on if you know what you are doing and live the Bentley lifestyle. If you took roughly half the money and bought franchise restaurants, say Subways for example, you could do very well. Typically one years worth of net profits is needed for the deposit so you could buy about ten of them. So roughly you would net about $650,000 or so a year or about $55,000 a month. Decent investments on the other half of your money should give you about another $5,000 a month so you have about $60,000 a month to play with before taxes.
If you leased a Bentley, a Ferrari and a Range Rover that should run you about $8,000 a month, mortgages on a million dollar home in the US and another one in the Caribbean for example another $12,000 a month and say another $5,000 a month for expenses and food etc so you are spending about $25,000 a month for a pretty great lifestyle with lots of money left over.
Point taken but here is my take: I work in an industry in which we freely share what we earn and discuss topics such as net worth. Since my compensation is purely based on performance, there is nothing to fear about others knowing what I earn. Transparency is a good thing in that regard. Ditto for those in government and military. But those whose compensation is based a bit on office politics, I understand secrecy of compensation is often demanded by the company/organization and adhered to by the workers. The fact others know what you make or have does not necessarily open you up to handout or loan requests. So I understand the secrecy some people place on their income and net worth, but I see it coming from either a position of fear or even ignorance of one's own net worth and not from legitimate reasons. Most people know that Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Tiger Woods, Paul McCartney, Nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama are well off to wealthy individuals, but I don't see people hitting any of them up for handouts or loans. In fact, Barack Obama is hitting up Americans for handouts for his re-election effort in record-setting fashion.
I am also a very prudent individual, and I would only purchase a luxury item only if the total expenditure and upkeep represents less than 10 percent of my annual income. I also like freedom when it comes to the automobiles I drive, so I would not be interested in a lease scenario. I like to keep it simple when it comes to such things, and leases are anything but simple.
Quote: Originally posted by myturn08 on May 1, 2012
i like it when a group of people win, 172 would be too much for one person, if i have had the sole winning ticket i would be giving most of it away
You are clearly speaking for yourself and other like-minded socialists. But 172 million or whatever the cash value was is just right for a person like me and my LLC. Give it away...I can see such people ending up on "Curse of the Lottery". Giving it away might make you feel good, but tell me how things fare for you once you have given most of it away and some unexpected calamity arises that wipes out your remaining stash. Tell me how readily others come to your aid then. You might find a few, but unless you became a larger than life benevolent giver in your area, I think we might find you poor and destitute and rueing the day you won the lottery like so many lottery jackpot rags-to-riches-back-to-rags stories.
Quote: Originally posted by OldSchoolPa on May 1, 2012
Point taken but here is my take: I work in an industry in which we freely share what we earn and discuss topics such as net worth. Since my compensation is purely based on performance, there is nothing to fear about others knowing what I earn. Transparency is a good thing in that regard. Ditto for those in government and military. But those whose compensation is based a bit on office politics, I understand secrecy of compensation is often demanded by the company/organization and adhered to by the workers. The fact others know what you make or have does not necessarily open you up to handout or loan requests. So I understand the secrecy some people place on their income and net worth, but I see it coming from either a position of fear or even ignorance of one's own net worth and not from legitimate reasons. Most people know that Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Tiger Woods, Paul McCartney, Nancy Pelosi, and Barack Obama are well off to wealthy individuals, but I don't see people hitting any of them up for handouts or loans. In fact, Barack Obama is hitting up Americans for handouts for his re-election effort in record-setting fashion.
I am also a very prudent individual, and I would only purchase a luxury item only if the total expenditure and upkeep represents less than 10 percent of my annual income. I also like freedom when it comes to the automobiles I drive, so I would not be interested in a lease scenario. I like to keep it simple when it comes to such things, and leases are anything but simple.
From having been in car sales/management there in nothing really complex about a lease.
You pick out your vehicle, the term and mileage, then simply sign and drive. I leased hundreds of vehicles. The turnaround for paper work is
usually just a couple of hours. Another great advantage of leasing, is the great write off if you have a business, and your car is always under
warranty.
Quote: Originally posted by Cletu$2 on May 1, 2012
I won't join a pool for ANY reason.If you want to join a pool,then join a pool.Don't assume that everyone would join one,just because you would.
one less person to share the wealth with
Quote: Originally posted by OldSchoolPa on May 1, 2012
You are clearly speaking for yourself and other like-minded socialists. But 172 million or whatever the cash value was is just right for a person like me and my LLC. Give it away...I can see such people ending up on "Curse of the Lottery". Giving it away might make you feel good, but tell me how things fare for you once you have given most of it away and some unexpected calamity arises that wipes out your remaining stash. Tell me how readily others come to your aid then. You might find a few, but unless you became a larger than life benevolent giver in your area, I think we might find you poor and destitute and rueing the day you won the lottery like so many lottery jackpot rags-to-riches-back-to-rags stories.
yeah u are right, i can easily say that now until that money is deposited into my account!!! i will just keep it in the family :-)
Quote: Originally posted by Lucky SOB on May 1, 2012
one less person to share the wealth with
I've always thought pools were quite refreshing, relaxing and profitable. Come on in.......the waters fine!
Quote: Originally posted by myturn08 on May 1, 2012
i like it when a group of people win, 172 would be too much for one person, if i have had the sole winning ticket i would be giving most of it away
Don't try pissing in our hands and tell us it's rainwater.People on this board are smarter than that.
Quote: Originally posted by Lucky SOB on May 1, 2012
one less person to share the wealth with
Thats ONE way to look at.Another is to realize that some <snip> is almost always waiting in the wings expecting everyone in the pool to ante up his share.If they don't ante up he will sue them.Even if he doesn't win the real winners don't get their money for several years because the courts are so slow and are out lawyer fees.No thanks,I'll play my numbers alone.
This post has been automatically changed by the Lottery Post computer system to remove inappropriate content and/or spam.
Congratulations to this jackpot winner. This is the 2nd time in the year 2012 that a Powerball Jackpot winner ended up in a double number.
Quote: Originally posted by mcginnin56 on May 1, 2012
From having been in car sales/management there in nothing really complex about a lease.
You pick out your vehicle, the term and mileage, then simply sign and drive. I leased hundreds of vehicles. The turnaround for paper work is
usually just a couple of hours. Another great advantage of leasing, is the great write off if you have a business, and your car is always under
warranty.
I just don't do auto leases. Common tactic of some car salesmen is to take emphasis off price of vehicle and instead start manipulating the lease term and payment amount. Perhaps high end dealerships like exotic car dealerships and those that sell Maybachs and Bentleys don't engage in such shenanigans, but I know lower end dealers do which is why car salesmen are rated negatively among sales people. Ditto for insurance agents who sell product that offers highest commission vice best and most coverage for family.
I also don't do things anymore for tax write off. I pay my fair share and I am so anti-Obama. Off topic...the thing that intrigues me is that a citizen found telling less than the truth before a Congressional panel will swiftly find himself/herself incarcerated while a Congress person or president who lies to the American people usually gets re-elected. A citizen who under reports taxes usually ends up in lockup while Chairman of House Ways and Means (I won't name him but I think he served NY and has a distinctive name that rhymes with Charlie Rangle) keeps his post and stays free. OWS should be less concerned about the 1 percent who worked for what they have and instead rail against the hypocrisy of the White House and Congress, especially those Dems.
Quote: Originally posted by OldSchoolPa on May 1, 2012
I just don't do auto leases. Common tactic of some car salesmen is to take emphasis off price of vehicle and instead start manipulating the lease term and payment amount. Perhaps high end dealerships like exotic car dealerships and those that sell Maybachs and Bentleys don't engage in such shenanigans, but I know lower end dealers do which is why car salesmen are rated negatively among sales people. Ditto for insurance agents who sell product that offers highest commission vice best and most coverage for family.
I also don't do things anymore for tax write off. I pay my fair share and I am so anti-Obama. Off topic...the thing that intrigues me is that a citizen found telling less than the truth before a Congressional panel will swiftly find himself/herself incarcerated while a Congress person or president who lies to the American people usually gets re-elected. A citizen who under reports taxes usually ends up in lockup while Chairman of House Ways and Means (I won't name him but I think he served NY and has a distinctive name that rhymes with Charlie Rangle) keeps his post and stays free. OWS should be less concerned about the 1 percent who worked for what they have and instead rail against the hypocrisy of the White House and Congress, especially those Dems.
Yeah, like anything else a consumer must be armed with current dealers invoices, sales/lease incentives and promotions, etc. to cut the best deal.
I agree with you about Obama and the tricky Dem's.
Quote: Originally posted by myturn08 on May 1, 2012
i like it when a group of people win, 172 would be too much for one person, if i have had the sole winning ticket i would be giving most of it away
"i like it when a group of people win, 172 would be too much for one person, if i have had the sole winning ticket i would be giving most of it away"
I thought the same way when I was in Grammar School ........... then I moved on to Junior High School and became a mature adult!
Wealth trickles down and Poverty trickles up! Wealthy people create jobs!!!
Quote: Originally posted by OldSchoolPa on May 1, 2012
I just don't do auto leases. Common tactic of some car salesmen is to take emphasis off price of vehicle and instead start manipulating the lease term and payment amount. Perhaps high end dealerships like exotic car dealerships and those that sell Maybachs and Bentleys don't engage in such shenanigans, but I know lower end dealers do which is why car salesmen are rated negatively among sales people. Ditto for insurance agents who sell product that offers highest commission vice best and most coverage for family.
I also don't do things anymore for tax write off. I pay my fair share and I am so anti-Obama. Off topic...the thing that intrigues me is that a citizen found telling less than the truth before a Congressional panel will swiftly find himself/herself incarcerated while a Congress person or president who lies to the American people usually gets re-elected. A citizen who under reports taxes usually ends up in lockup while Chairman of House Ways and Means (I won't name him but I think he served NY and has a distinctive name that rhymes with Charlie Rangle) keeps his post and stays free. OWS should be less concerned about the 1 percent who worked for what they have and instead rail against the hypocrisy of the White House and Congress, especially those Dems.
"...car salesmen are rated negatively..."
Roger that, OldSchool! Big Time!
Most people consider car salesmen even sleazier than lawyers!
They have to lie to make a living and they get so used to lying they never stop.
Joe-Joe Biden was a used car salesman before he started screwing up the country.
Quote: Originally posted by rdgrnr on May 2, 2012
"...car salesmen are rated negatively..."
Roger that, OldSchool! Big Time!
Most people consider car salesmen even sleazier than lawyers!
They have to lie to make a living and they get so used to lying they never stop.
Joe-Joe Biden was a used car salesman before he started screwing up the country.
"sleazier than lawyers"
I think not, look at The Pretendident and Vice Pretendident!
They don't come any sleazier !!!!!!!!!!!
Quote: Originally posted by dpoly1 on May 2, 2012
"sleazier than lawyers"
I think not, look at The Pretendident and Vice Pretendident!
They don't come any sleazier !!!!!!!!!!!
Ya got me there, dpoly.
Good point.
![]() © 2022 Speednet Group LLC Lottery Post is a registered trademark of Speednet Group. |
Welcome Guest
Your last visit: Wed, Jun 29, 2022, 7:55 am