Ct. lottery ticket worth $3.5 million expires

Feb 22, 2007, 5:46 pm (16 comments)

Connecticut Lottery

Officials Reject 200 Lost Ticket Claims

The dream of becoming a millionaire could be turning into someone's nightmare.

Connecticut lottery officials said no one has produced the winning ticket for a $3.5 million jackpot in the Feb. 14, 2006, drawing.

The winning ticket expired and is worthless, lottery officials said.

However, officials said if someone mailed it in and it was postmarked before the deadline, it would be honored.

Lottery officials and the Division of Special Revenue examined 186 lost ticket claims for the 2006 jackpot and found none to be valid, Lottery spokeswoman Diane Patterson said.  Those claiming to have lost a ticket paid a $100 nonrefundable fee.

Patterson said the people who had made the claims didn't have such basic facts as where and when the winning ticket was purchased.

But there is one winner in the story of the jackpot that turned into a pumpkin.

The Coventry Getty Mart in Coventry, which sold the winning ticket, is getting a $10,000 bonus.

Zee Zahid had the winning lottery ticket, worth $3.5 million, in his hand for a few seconds one year ago.

Zahid, proprietor of the Coventry Getty Mart, was notified by lottery officials recently that it was his store that sold the Feb. 14, 2006 jackpot-winning ticket that expired last week, after remaining unclaimed for more than a year.

By checking employee records from a year ago, Zahid says, he was able to figure out exactly which of his employees sold the unclaimed ticket.

"I figured out I'm the one who called in that day" to be at work Zahid said Wednesday, smiling as he sold a lottery ticket to a regular customer.

"I'm still digging up some old video" from the store's surveillance cameras, Zahid said. "Maybe we can see who bought the ticket."

But unfortunately for the purchaser of the winning ticket, any identification now could only be for the sake of curiosity.

Connecticut lottery officials declared last week that the deadline to postmark or claim the $3.5 million prize passed on Valentine's Day, and the ticket is now worthless.

The winning numbers for the Classic Lotto drawing on Feb. 14, 2006, were 15, 17, 19, 26, 37, 38.

Officials delayed announcing Zahid's store had sold the winning ticket to allow time to process the nearly 200 lost ticket claims.

Even though the ticket was unclaimed, Zahid will still receive a $10,000 bonus for selling the winning ticket.  And the sum could have been greater — possibly $35,000 — had someone come forward to claim the ticket.

Despite the lack of a giveaway, the convenience store also will receive a sign proclaiming that a $3.5 million winner was sold there.

And, Zahid says, the knowledge that a winning ticket was sold at the store is ultimately good publicity.

"People are going to be bringing in more business and buying more tickets" because of the sale of the now-defunct ticket, Zahid said.

The fate of the unclaimed prize money — equivalent to a $2.2 million lump sum — will be determined by Lottery CEO Jim Vance.

According to Vance, there are three options for the cash: return it to the state's general fund, use it to supplement prizes in other lottery games, or use it for marketing and promotions initiatives for the Connecticut lottery.

The next Classic Lotto drawing will take place Friday for a $3.3 million jackpot.

Good luck.

AP, Journal Inquirer, Lottery Post Staff

Tags for this story

Other popular tags

Comments

justxploring's avatarjustxploring

However, officials said if someone mailed it in and it was postmarked before the deadline, it would be honored.

 

Who the heck would do that?  Even if I weren't physically able to drive, I'd pay someone to take me.  As always, I feel this is really a shame.

I'm surprised CT doesn't announce the name of the retailer. Florida always lists the name and address of the place where a ticket was purchased.  They then try to find the winner by posting announcements at the store.  On the other hand, not listing the retailer does help to eliminate those people who make false claims.

LckyLary

It's probably mine. I ALWAYS go to ummmm... Coventry! to play my numbers. Maybe the dog ate it. Anyway... I think what happens is people play so many Quick Picks and then they put them aside with other papers and lose track of them, and they don't pay attention to the Lottery website announcing unclaimed prizes. This is the first I am reading it, and if it were mine it would be too late. At least the store should have been able to mention it. One time I won something it was 2 weeks later I found the ticket while checking a stack of them. I'd be curious to know if that was a QP or Manual pick.

MissNYC's avatarMissNYC

It's nice that everyone waits until NOW to investigate. If they had a possible video, you think they'd take a look at it before it was too late. Eh well, hopefully they won't ever find out, because in this situation, what the person doesn't know, won't hurt them. On a side note, I always found it strange that lottery sales would increase at a store that sold a winning ticket. I think I'd be less likely to buy a ticket from such a place banking on the "lightning doesn't strike the same place twice" theory; but that's just me. Anyhow, a word to the wise, if your gonna spend the money on a lotto ticket, at least take a look.

Todd's avatarTodd

Quote: Originally posted by justxploring on Feb 22, 2007

However, officials said if someone mailed it in and it was postmarked before the deadline, it would be honored.

 

Who the heck would do that?  Even if I weren't physically able to drive, I'd pay someone to take me.  As always, I feel this is really a shame.

I'm surprised CT doesn't announce the name of the retailer. Florida always lists the name and address of the place where a ticket was purchased.  They then try to find the winner by posting announcements at the store.  On the other hand, not listing the retailer does help to eliminate those people who make false claims.

Since you've asked, go to the link below and scroll down to Friday, June 15, 2001.  The CNN link is still working.

http://www.usamega.com/archive-062001.htm

dumars798's avatardumars798

I wish i had it,i'll be at the

lottery headquarters 20

min after the drawing

took place with my lawyer

on speed dial..lol

justxploring's avatarjustxploring

Thanks, Todd!   I agree with his wife when she asked "Are you crazy?"  I mean, that man really wasn't thinking too clearly.  He's really lucky, especially since it arrived 3 days after the deadline.  I wouldn't even use certified mail, but sending a $46 million winner by regular mail? 

JAG331

Quote: Originally posted by justxploring on Feb 22, 2007

However, officials said if someone mailed it in and it was postmarked before the deadline, it would be honored.

 

Who the heck would do that?  Even if I weren't physically able to drive, I'd pay someone to take me.  As always, I feel this is really a shame.

I'm surprised CT doesn't announce the name of the retailer. Florida always lists the name and address of the place where a ticket was purchased.  They then try to find the winner by posting announcements at the store.  On the other hand, not listing the retailer does help to eliminate those people who make false claims.

CT purposefully does not release the name of the retailer until the ticket has expired.  There is a law on the books that allows a person to claim a CT Classic Lotto jackpot without a ticket.  So when your dog eats the ticket...if you know what numbers you picked...you've got your playslips, can identify other lines that you bought on the same ticket, you know that you bought the ticket the day before the drawing, around 7:20pm, at the Coventry Getty Mart....pretty solid proof for the lottery commission to pay out.

By keeping the sale location secret, CT can easily toss most of those 186 phony claims because the person claimed to buy their ticket in New London, or Stamford, etc.

RJOh's avatarRJOh

"Lottery officials and the Division of Special Revenue examined 186 lost ticket claims for the 2006 jackpot and found none to be valid, Lottery spokeswoman Diane Patterson said.  Those claiming to have lost a ticket paid a $100 nonrefundable fee."

Looks like Connecticut lottery have found a way to save some money when scammers try to make a false claim for a winning ticket that goes unclaimed. 

lmatlaw

It still boggles my mind how people who buy lottery tickets can be so casual as to not check them after the drawing takes place to see if they had a winner. Why did they buy the ticket in the first place?

pumpi76

Can anyone tell me what do they do with the tickets no one claims?

 

"Keno is "el diablo cazador de hombres"             "You can't see it..."                     "And it skins them......."                                                   from movie "Predator 1"....

four4me

Quote: Originally posted by pumpi76 on Feb 23, 2007

Can anyone tell me what do they do with the tickets no one claims?

 

"Keno is "el diablo cazador de hombres"             "You can't see it..."                     "And it skins them......."                                                   from movie "Predator 1"....

it depends on what there lottery bi laws say sometimes the money goes into the general fund and sometimes they use the money for future promotional games.

justxploring's avatarjustxploring

Quote: Originally posted by JAG331 on Feb 23, 2007

CT purposefully does not release the name of the retailer until the ticket has expired.  There is a law on the books that allows a person to claim a CT Classic Lotto jackpot without a ticket.  So when your dog eats the ticket...if you know what numbers you picked...you've got your playslips, can identify other lines that you bought on the same ticket, you know that you bought the ticket the day before the drawing, around 7:20pm, at the Coventry Getty Mart....pretty solid proof for the lottery commission to pay out.

By keeping the sale location secret, CT can easily toss most of those 186 phony claims because the person claimed to buy their ticket in New London, or Stamford, etc.

I understand, JAG331.  I think it makes sense to hold back those details, the same way details of a crime aren't released to the media. However, I guess I got so used to Florida announcing the retailer and going out of its way to find the winner, that I expect that in other states. 

I also agree with RJOh's comment. I feel the $100 fee is very reasonable.  Even if someone is being sincere, paying $100 to collect a large jackpot is worth every penny. So maybe many of the people who file claims think they might actually be the winner.  This suggests to me that a lot of people buy tickets and lose them.

So when your dog eats the ticket...if you know what numbers you picked...you've got your playslips, can identify other lines that you bought on the same ticket, you know that you bought the ticket the day before the drawing, around 7:20pm, at the Coventry Getty Mart....

JAG, just my opinion - but if someone leaves a lottery ticket in a place where it can get lost or destroyed, then that same person probably won't have the other information you mentioned. Maybe I'm being too judgmental.  I know the possibilities are slim that I'll win, but I still treat every ticket as if it's a winner and put it in a safe place.  I suppose knowing where the ticket was purchased and approximately the time isn't too difficult to remember.  If someone has that information, will they then use the video tapes to confirm the claim?  To tell you the truth, I have no idea exactly where I bought my tickets most of the time. I stop at Publix, 7-11, Sweetbay, Sunoco..wherever I am when I think about it on Sat.  Maybe I should write down the time & place! 

JAG331

Well, I think you've got it right!

If you keep the ticket in a safe place, this will never happen in the first place!

CASH Only

Quote: Originally posted by justxploring on Feb 23, 2007

I understand, JAG331.  I think it makes sense to hold back those details, the same way details of a crime aren't released to the media. However, I guess I got so used to Florida announcing the retailer and going out of its way to find the winner, that I expect that in other states. 

I also agree with RJOh's comment. I feel the $100 fee is very reasonable.  Even if someone is being sincere, paying $100 to collect a large jackpot is worth every penny. So maybe many of the people who file claims think they might actually be the winner.  This suggests to me that a lot of people buy tickets and lose them.

So when your dog eats the ticket...if you know what numbers you picked...you've got your playslips, can identify other lines that you bought on the same ticket, you know that you bought the ticket the day before the drawing, around 7:20pm, at the Coventry Getty Mart....

JAG, just my opinion - but if someone leaves a lottery ticket in a place where it can get lost or destroyed, then that same person probably won't have the other information you mentioned. Maybe I'm being too judgmental.  I know the possibilities are slim that I'll win, but I still treat every ticket as if it's a winner and put it in a safe place.  I suppose knowing where the ticket was purchased and approximately the time isn't too difficult to remember.  If someone has that information, will they then use the video tapes to confirm the claim?  To tell you the truth, I have no idea exactly where I bought my tickets most of the time. I stop at Publix, 7-11, Sweetbay, Sunoco..wherever I am when I think about it on Sat.  Maybe I should write down the time & place! 

Unfortunately, because of how Florida interprets the 60-day rule, if FL conducts a "winner's" search for an about-to-expire FL Lotto or Mega Money ticket and is successful, the ticket holder is forced to receive 20 or 30 annual payments, depending on the game (FL starts the clock with the drawing, rather than with the claim.) I see no benefit to FL for making that decision about the 60-day rule. This is especially unfortunate since FL is a vacation state, with many elderly people, with some of them living there only part of the year.

Subscribe to this news story
Guest